LIBRARY: Cost Effective In-Service Training Alternatives for Small Jails. Rev. [ed.]

HOME | What's New! | Contact Us | Site Map | Sign In

Training Opportunity » "Managing Jail Design and Construction"

Corrections Library

Self-Study Options

Assisted Research

Cost Effective In-Service Training Alternatives for Small Jails. Rev. [ed.]

Cost Effective In-Service Training Alternatives for Small Jails

Downloaded 122 times since 05/11/2007.

Reid, Tom

National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC)

Published 2006. 16 pages.

"This Training Resource Package recommends several cost-effective methods of providing in-service training for existing staff (p.3)." Sections of this document include: theme--if it meets all the requirements of "Defendable Training," it is training; executive summary; introduction; needs; training delivery options--in-service field training, shift overlap training delivery sessions, experiential training, shift scenario reviews, staff independent studies programs, training presentations during staff meetings, and other in-service training methods (e.g., correspondence courses, ride-alongs, videos, e-learning, satellite downlink, training consortium, and classroom training); and summary. Accession Number: 013923

Related Documents

The application of cost-benefit analysis to crime prevention has been fairly limited. This document examines this topic with most of its examples ...
:: View Details
Benefit-Cost Analysis and Crime Prevention
"Uniform cost per day" operational cost figures for juvenile and adult correctional programs for 1999 and 2000 in Texas are presented. This report is ...
:: View Details
Limes to Limes: Comparing the Operational Costs of Juvenile and Adult Correctional Programs in Texas
California's Department of Corrections' calculations on the amount of incarceration costs per inmate focus primarily on those operating costs ...
:: View Details
California Department of Corrections: The Cost of Incarcerating Inmates in State-Run Prisons Is Higher Than the Department's Published Cost
Cost-per-day figures for inmate incarceration are vitally important. The author notes that there can be great differences in figures generated by ...
:: View Details
Cost Comparisons Between State and Private Correctional Facilities: Apples to Apples
There is a positive return on investment realized by Florida taxpayers for money invested in state correctional education. The Costs Consequences ...
:: View Details
Return on Investment for Correctional Education in Florida
Some prevention and intervention programs lower criminality, some do not. Programs that can deliver modest reductions in future criminal activity at ...
:: View Details
The Comparative Costs and Benefits of Programs to Reduce Crime: A Review of National Research Findings With Implications for Washington State, Version 3.0
The median social costs per year per male offender for New York, New Mexico, and Arizona were, respectively, $31,866, $26,486, $25,472. Using these ...
:: View Details
Right-Sizing Justice: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Imprisonment in Three States
The operational cost per day for programs and services provided to Texan offenders for FY 2001 and 2002 is analyzed. Sections of this report include: ...
:: View Details
Mangos to Mangos: Comparing the Operational Costs of Juveniles and Adult Correctional Programs in Texas
This report finds that it would cost approximately $168,189,800 annually to test all executive branch employees and new hires for drugs, provided ...
:: View Details
Employee Drug Testing: Estimated Cost to Test All Executive Branch Employees and New Hires
While GAO has consistently supported the use of value engineering as a cost saving technique in appropriate settings, such as in construction, ...
:: View Details
Value Engineering: Usefulness Well Established When Applied Appropriately / Statement of L. Nye Stevens

Viewed 2676 times since 05/11/2007 | Last Modified: 5/11/2007 7:47:56 AM

:: USA.gov > U.S. Dept. of Justice > Bureau of Prisons > National Institute of Corrections > .:: Privacy & Disclaimers :: Accessibility ::.