HOME
|
What's New!
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
| Sign In
Training
Find Training
Self-Study Training
Video / Satellite
Resources for Trainers
About Our Training
Services
Consulting
Research Assistance
Library
Browse the Online Library
Web Site Directory
Popular Topics
Ask A Research Expert
About the Library
Community
Corrections News/Blogs
Discussion Forums
Shared Files
FREE! Join Now!
Projects
Learn about what we are working on and locate opportunities for assistance, research, and training related to key topics in corrections.
About Us
Overview
Divisions
History
Mission & Goals
Organizational Structure
Advisory Board
Employment Opportunities
Cooperative Agreements
Publications
New in the Library
» "
Michigan Priorities Survey
"
Library
Corrections Library
Self-Study Options
Browse Online Library
Web Site Directory
Popular Topics
Online Curricula
Video Learning
Assisted Research
Ask A Research Expert
Ask Your Colleagues
Loading...
Findings from the Evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program. Final report
View/Download
Findings from the Evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program
Downloaded 18 times since 12/04/2006.
Author(s)
Harrell, Adele
Cavanaugh, Shannon
Roman, John
Source(s)
Urban Institute (Washington, DC)
Sponsor(s)
U.S. Dept. of Justice (Washington, DC)
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (Rockville, MD)
Details
Published 1998.
173 pages.
Related Topics
District of Columbia
Drug courts
(Justice System)
Drug testing
(Administration)
Drug treatment
(Offender Services)
Evaluation program
(Statistics &Research)
The Superior Court Drug Intervention Program involved the testing of court-based interventions with drug-using felony defendants randomly assigned to one of three dockets. The standard docket involved twice-weekly drug testing, judicial monitoring, and verbal encouragement to get treatment. The treatment docket utilized drug testing 3-5 times a week, and an intensive day treatment program. The sanction docket involved a graduated sanction program, drug tests twice a week; judicial monitoring, and referrals to treatment. Cost per day per participant was $10.78 for those in the graduated sanctions program, and $21.01 for those in the treatment program. Graduation from graduated sanctions and treatment programs, respectively, were 30% and 19%, with 9% leaving the treatment program doing well. Compared to standard docket participants, those in the experimental programs experienced significantly reduced pretrial drug use. Research did not show significant reductions in drug use or criminal activity in the year following sentencing.
Accession Number: 015825
Related Documents
In response to recommendations made in November 1998 regarding disturbances at the contract prison facility in Youngstown, Ohio, this report was ...
::
View Details
District of Columbia: Issues Related to the Youngstown Prison Report and Lorton Closure Process
The D.C. criminal justice system is comprised of five D.C. agencies/D.C. funded, six federal agencies/federally funded, and three D.C. ...
::
View Details
D.C. Criminal Justice System: Better Coordination Needed Among Participating Agencies
The National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 required the transition of female felony offenders to the Bureau of ...
::
View Details
Women in Prison: Transition of District of Columbia Female Felons to the Federal Bureau of Prisons
City-to-city comparisons are made based upon Crime Index data and arrestee drug testing data. Cities compared to Washington, D.C. had populations of ...
::
View Details
Criminal Justice Statistics for Washington, D.C., and Other Major Cities
"Ingredients for success" as determined by a focus group composed of individuals who successfully transitioned from prison to the community are ...
::
View Details
Summary of Focus Group with Ex-Prisoners in the District: Ingredients for Successful Reintegration
Information about and services of this organization serving incarcerated women and their families can be found at this website. Points of access ...
::
View Details
Our Place DC
Access to this extensive guide is available at this website. Fifteen chapters comprise this volume: plan ahead if getting out soon; the first six ...
::
View Details
Starting Out, Starting Over, Staying Out: A Guide to District of Columbia Ex-Offenders: Housing, Food, Employment and Other Resources
In 1993, more District of Columbia residents were sitting in prison cells than in publicly-funded college classrooms. This paper discusses this data ...
::
View Details
Trading Classrooms for Cell Blocks: Destructive Policies Eroding D.C. Communities
Halfway houses serve a vital function as being a place that exists between incarceration and successful re-entry into the community. The District of ...
::
View Details
Half-Truths: The Complicated Story of D.C.'s Halfway House "Escapees"
A private not-for-profit firm was awarded by the Receiver a contract to provide medical services to D.C. Jail inmates. Discussion surrounds the ...
::
View Details
District of Columbia Receivership: Selected Issues Related to Medical Services at the D.C. Jail
Viewed 2034 times since 10/31/2006
| Last Modified: 10/31/2006 10:33:39 AM
::
USA.gov
>
U.S. Dept. of Justice
>
Bureau of Prisons
>
National Institute of Corrections
>
.::
Privacy & Disclaimers
::
Accessibility
::.