LIBRARY: Evidence-Based Practice to Reduce Recidivism: Implications for State Judiciaries

HOME | What's New! | Contact Us | Site Map | Sign In

New in the Library » "Working with the Third Sector to Reduce Re-Offending: Securing Effective Partnerships 2008-2011"

Corrections Library

Self-Study Options

Assisted Research

Evidence-Based Practice to Reduce Recidivism: Implications for State Judiciaries

Evidence-Based Practice to Reduce Recidivism: Implications for State Judiciaries

Downloaded 0 times since 02/05/2008.

Warren, Roger K.

National Institute of Corrections. Community Corrections Division (Washington, DC)

Published 2007. 55 pages.

The reduction of recidivism by state judiciaries utilizing six principles of evidence-based practice (EBP) is explained. Seven sections follow an executive summary: introduction; current state sentencing policies and their consequences; drug courts -- the state judiciary's successful experiment with EBP; the principles of EBP; local sentencing and corrections policy reforms; state sentencing and corrections policy reforms; and conclusion. "[C]arefully targeted rehabilitation and treatment programs can reduce offender recidivism by conservative estimates of 10-20%" (p. 52). Accession Number: 022843

Related Documents

During the past decade, 140,000 drug-using offenders have been under drug court supervision with 71% either successfully completing or currently ...
:: View Details
Development and Implementation of Drug Court Systems
Ways to avoid conflicts between federal confidentiality laws and drug court operations are discussed. The primary problem is the restriction of ...
:: View Details
Excerpts from a Treaties on Ethics and Confidentiality in Drug Courts: Federal Confidentiality Laws and How They Effect Drug Court Practitioners
By January 2000, there were 449 drug courts in operation. "[T]his paper examines the relationship between these courts and custodial resources. . ...
:: View Details
Do Drug Courts Save Jail and Prison Beds?
While this brief testimony addresses diversion alternatives in general, issues surrounding drug courts are primarily focused upon. Issues discussed ...
:: View Details
Testimony on Drug Treatment Alternatives to Incarceration
A Phase II evaluation of drug courts in Tulsa, Creek, Oklahoma, Pontotoc, Seminole, Pottawatomie, and McClain counties is provided. Drug court ...
:: View Details
Evaluation of Oklahoma Drug Courts, 1997-2000
An implementation evaluation of this center's first 18 months of operation is presented. Sections of this report, following an executive summary, ...
:: View Details
Treatment Alternatives in the Criminal Court: A Process Evaluation of the Bronx County Drug Court
Substance abuse treatment and other treatment services used by and issues regarding the obtaining and delivering of high-quality comprehensive ...
:: View Details
Treatment Services in Adult Drug Courts: Report on the 1999 National Drug Court Treatment Survey: Executive Summary
Access to a collection of information regarding drug courts as provided by the OJP Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project can be ...
:: View Details
Justice Programs Office of the School of Public Affairs (SPA) at the American University
Published and unpublished program evaluations done between 1999 and April 2001 or 28 drug courts, 7 juvenile drug courts, one family drug court, and ...
:: View Details
Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review, 2001 Update
The purpose of drug courts is to use the authority of the courts to reduce crime by changing offenders' drug-using behaviors. This report describes ...
:: View Details
Drug Courts: Information on a New Approach to Address Drug-Related Crime

Viewed 4462 times since 02/05/2008 | Last Modified: 2/5/2008 3:40:54 PM

:: USA.gov > U.S. Dept. of Justice > Bureau of Prisons > National Institute of Corrections > .:: Privacy & Disclaimers :: Accessibility ::.